What Changes Were Made in Food Compass 2.0 Ratings?

Food Compass 2.0 is transforming the way we evaluate the healthfulness of foods and beverages, using the latest research on nutrients and the intricate relationship between diet and health. This updated nutrient profiling system (NPS) offers an enhanced framework that guides consumers toward smarter eating choices worldwide.

What is Food Compass?

Food Compass serves as a nutrient profiling system designed to accurately assess the healthfulness of a variety of foods and beverages. A recent study published in Nature Food has upgraded Food Compass by integrating new data on recent diet-health evidence and ingredient specifics. This improvement is particularly vital in light of the rising prevalence of diet-related non-communicable diseases, highlighting the urgent need for effective public health strategies.

Understanding Nutrient Profiling Systems (NPS)

Nutrient profiling systems utilize quantitative algorithms to evaluate the healthfulness of foods and beverages. Food Compass 2.0 provides more nuanced distinctions between minimally processed and highly processed foods. A key enhancement from its predecessor is that it awards positive scores for non-ultraprocessed items, encouraging healthier food choices.

The Role of NPS in Public Health

As governments and industries increasingly rely on nutrient profiling systems, they are becoming instrumental in developing menu labeling, health claim eligibility, and reformulation targets. Despite their utility, these systems face limitations, including inadequate assessment of various food ingredients, failure to consider processing characteristics, and inconsistent scoring across food categories.

Addressing Limitations with Food Compass 2.0

Launched in 2021, Food Compass aimed to provide a balanced assessment of foods and beverages while minimizing subjectivity. By scoring mixed foods and meals and increasing consistency, Food Compass 2.0 enhances its association with health risk factors. To sustain these advantages, ongoing revisions using new data and community feedback are essential.

Key Findings from the Study

The original Food Compass scores (FCS) were compared with the updated Food Compass 2.0 across 9,273 unique foods and beverages from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) dataset. Significant updates included:

• New data on added sugars in food ingredients.
• Information on additives such as artificial sweeteners.
• Neutral scoring for fruit and vegetable juices.
• Increased scoring weight for dietary fiber and long-chain omega-3 fatty acids.
• Reduced scoring weight for dairy fat as a negative attribute.

Scoring System Overview

Food items are categorized based on their FCS:

• ≤30: Foods to be minimized.
• 31-69: Foods to be consumed in moderation.
• ≥70: Foods to be encouraged.

Major food groups such as meat, poultry, eggs, fats, oils, legumes, and nuts have been detailed to provide clearer insights into their healthfulness.

Notable Changes in Food Scoring

The transition from Food Compass to Food Compass 2.0 revealed shifts in mean FCS for various food categories:

• Cold cereals, cereal bars, plant-based dairy, and fruit and vegetable juices saw declines in scores.
• Meanwhile, scores for beef, pork, seafood, lamb, eggs, rice, and pasta increased.

Specific foods also displayed significant score changes; for instance, a whole fried egg without fat increased from an FCS of 48 to 62, while an egg substitute dropped from 50 to 45. Most legumes, seafood, nuts, vegetables, and fruits scored 70 or higher, while low-scoring items were primarily those high in added sugars or artificial additives.

Comparison with Other Nutrient Profiling Systems

While systems like Health Star Rating (HSR), Nutri-Score, and NOVA classification share considerable overlap, notable distinctions exist. For example, products with the highest and lowest FCS in HSR diverged from those in Food Compass 2.0, highlighting the unique contributions of each NPS.

Implications for Daily Diets

Food Compass 2.0 has proven effective in extending individual food scores to daily dietary patterns. Using a nationally representative dataset of 47,099 adults, the energy-weighted average FCS of foods and beverages consumed (referred to as i.FCS) closely correlated with the Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2015), thus validating its application in assessing healthy dietary patterns.

The study also adjusted for various health variables, including body mass index (BMI), cholesterol levels, and fasting plasma glucose, indicating that the updated i.FCS is associated with lower all-cause mortality rates.

Conclusion: A New Era in Nutritional Assessment

Food Compass 2.0 effectively characterizes food items based on their healthfulness, demonstrating validity against healthful dietary patterns and outcomes. Its application has extended beyond the U.S., showing promise in countries like Greece, Korea, and China. As collaborations expand, Food Compass 2.0 aims to become a global standard for promoting healthier eating choices.

By integrating cutting-edge research and data-driven insights, Food Compass 2.0 is poised to play a pivotal role in improving public health and guiding individuals toward better nutrition.

In summary, Food Compass 2.0 stands as a groundbreaking tool in the fight against diet-related diseases, equipping consumers with the knowledge they need to make informed dietary choices. By prioritizing health and wellness, it fosters a healthier future for individuals and communities alike.